When we are
very young we are mostly blank slates. This enables us to absorb data directly
because we haven’t yet developed a mental filter. We become attached to things
and people, such as certain foods, our mother, our lifestyle, and our religion,
because there is nothing else to compare them to, so they seem like
unquestionable “givens”. That is, since there is nothing else to compare them
to, there is no question as to whether they are true or real. They are all we
have, and so we attach ourselves to them. This is known as imprinting.
Later in
life we might become exposed to other people, foods, lifestyles, and religions.
They might be very different from what we’re used to: the people might have a
different skin color, the materialism of other lifestyles might be greater or
lesser than that of the one we grew up in, foods might taste very unfamiliar, and
religious dogmas might contradict what we’ve been taught. Since we have already
imprinted on a particular set of people, things and ideas, we might view these new ones as “bad”
or “wrong”. This is why people tend to cling to and defend their own race,
lifestyle, and beliefs. No amount of logic, reason, or even proof will convince
people that what they are used to isn’t necessarily any “better” or more “right”
than anything else. They can’t fathom that if they just happened to have been
born and brought up with a different skin color, lifestyle and belief system,
they would think that those were “correct” and that the ones they currently
cling to are “wrong”.
Why does
this stubborn blindness occur? Because people make a (false) self out of their
circumstances. They have built the idea of an action figure with a particular
skin color, nationality, religion, lifestyle, community, family, etc, and have
imprinted on it. By the time new data arrives, the mental construct that they
view as their “self” has already been formed. Even if they see that different
nationalities, lifestyles, and beliefs might have equal validity to their own,
they see their “self” as unchangeable. Hence they cannot – or, rather, will not
– change anything about themselves, because that would be tantamount to
self-annihilation.
This is a
simple case of mistaken identity. The true self is unchangeable, so feeling
unchangeable is a good thing; but people apply this sense of permanence to
their false self, which is
changeable. In fact, since it doesn’t actually exist, the false self can be
changed at the drop of a hat. People cling to the false self for a sense of
permanence, when the only permanence resides in the true self.
No comments:
Post a Comment